Digital resources in the Social Sciences and Humanities OpenEdition Our platforms OpenEdition Books OpenEdition Journals Hypotheses Calenda Libraries OpenEdition Freemium Follow us

Archival Science – Building ignorance by disseminating “evidence”: an agnotological look into the digital archives of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Pashkeeva, N. Building ignorance by disseminating “evidence”: an agnotological look into the digital archives of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Arch Sci (2024).

DOI: 10.1007/s10502-024-09447-9

Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice.Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world (excerpt from the publisher’s website).

Abstract
In democratic contexts, the discussion of digital technology in the field of archival heritage highlights its potential benefits for expanding access to archives to the wider public. It also focuses on the legal, moral, and ethical issues raised by copyright or privacy concerns. Using the digital archives of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) as a case study, this article thoroughly analyses another facet of digital technology, namely its role in building and perpetuating ignorance about the past through the mass digitization of archives in authoritarian contexts. The analysis scrutinizes digitally processed archives that are accessible as carefully curated data—some digitized and some born digital—through a network of open access web-resources developed by several institutions in the IRI. The article briefly considers the broader context of access restrictions to archives and information, and of the intentional and institutionalized opacity of this field in the IRI. These digitally processed archives are evaluated through the lens of archival science theory. Several macro- and micro-aspects of the kind of knowledge that scholars can produce from these digitally processed historical sources are considered.

Research for this article was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 803208 “Off-Site”). The content reflects only the author’s views and the ERC is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

READ THE ARTICLE

Natalia Pashkeeva is a postdoctoral researcher in the OFF-SITE research project, funded by the European Research Council (ERC) and hosted by the French National Centre for Scientific Research (Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS, Paris). In this research endeavour, she explores the concept of “evidence” within the field of archival science and digital technologies, focusing on access to archives and the Right to Know the past in authoritarian contexts. Natalia holds a master’s degree in Digital Technologies, History, and Archives from the École Nationale des Chartes (Paris), where she conducted her studies and research under the supervision of Christine Nougaret and Florence Clavaud. She co-authored a digital critical edition of the prison diaries and private correspondence of the journalist Henri Delescluze in Belle-Île (1851-1853), completed in 2015 and accessible at http://elec.enc.sorbonne.fr/delescluze/index.html. Subsequently, Natalia earned her Ph.D. in contemporary history at the Centre d’études russes, caucasiennes, est-européennes et centrasiatiques (CERCEC), École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, in Paris, where she is now an associate researcher.